
Taking Stock of the Antitrust Modernization Commission Report
@ the University of Colorado School of Law
September 5, 2007
This past spring, the Antitrust Modernization Commission issued a 449 page report addressing the state of antitrust law and practice. In general, the report highlighted that the antitrust laws remain effectively positioned to address anticompetitive conduct. Notably, the report rejected calls for new strategies or institutions to address high technology markets. It did, however, highlight a number of recommendations related to the intersection of antitrust and intellectual property law, including ones related to patent law reform and conduct related to standard setting bodies.
In line with its generally approving tone of current antitrust enforcement, the report did not call for any significant reforms of merger review, turning away an array of criticism of current practice. First, some commentators have suggested that the agencies abuse their leverage under the Hart Scott Rodino Act to obtain regulatory oversight or demand relief that they would not otherwise be able to achieve in court. Second, others have complained that the antitrust authorities have allowed mergers to proceed without imposing effective remedies and that the merger remedies process is often a black box. Third, some have suggested that the impact of innovation and potential entry are overly discounted by the current Merger Guidelines and that the authorities should have a greater tolerance of mergers than traditional antitrust metrics would call into question.
This conference will evaluate the judgments of the Antitrust Modernization Commission report, examining its basic conclusion that there are no fundamental flaws in modern antitrust law and practice as well as its various suggestions for reform. To do so, we will bring together some of the Commissioners who evaluated the state of antitrust law, current and former antitrust enforcers, and a number of leading antitrust practitioners. In particular, we will examine the report's conclusions within three broad headings--Rethinking Merger Review; Antitrust in the New Economy; and the Antitrust/IP Interface.
- Phil Weiser
Executive Director
Silicon Flatirons
Professor
University of Colorado Law School
|
- John Francis
Partner
Davis, Graham & Stubbs LLP
- Don Kempf
Member
Antitrust Modernization Commission
- Diana Moss
Vice President
American Antitrust Institute
Adjunct Professor of Economics
University of Colorado
- F.M. Scherer
Professor Emeritus
John F. Kennedy School of Government
Harvard University
|
- Jim Hartley
Holland & Hart
- Michael Katz
Professor of Economics and Business
New York University
Former FCC Chief Economist
- Douglas Melamed
Partner
Wilmerhale
Former Acting Assistant Attorney General
Antitrust Division
U.S. Department of Justice
- Tucker Trautman
Partner
Dorsey & Whitney
|
- Eugene Crew
Townsend and Townsend and Crew LLP
- Makan Delrahim
Partner
Brownstein Hyatt Farber & Schreck
- Karma Guillianelli
Partner
Bartlit Beck
- Roy Hoffinger
Qualcomm
|
- Gerald Masoudi
Deputy Assistant Attorney General
Antitrust Division
US Department of Justice
|
|
Conference Videos
Download videos of select prior conferences here.
Videos of select prior Silicon Flatirons conferences can also be ordered on DVD, VHS, or CD by contacting videos@silicon-flatirons.org
Conference Papers and Speech Texts
Select papers from our conferences are published in the Journal on Telecommunications and High Technology Law. To subscribe, contact the journal at jthtl@colorado.edu.
|